It is difficult to imagine a more diverse group of personalities
than the ancient prophets. Besides their individual differences, with their work
spread over a period longer than from the breakup of the Roman Empire to the
present, there was little in their times or environment to draw them to unity.
Who could have differed more than one man who had been drawn out of a nation of
idolaters, and another who had been reared from childhood in the precincts of
God's tabernacle? What more varied attitudes could have developed than those of
a man trained for twenty-eight years to occupy the throne of the greatest nation
of the day and those of a simple herdsman called to bear a message to a
rebellious neighboring nation? There is no indication that God chose men of any
particular kind of background, personality, talents, or education. He chose the
man he could use best at the moment, or the one He could best prepare for future
service. He apparently disregarded any set pattern, and gave attention only to
the suitability of the man for the task. Some of the reasons for this procedure
seem obvious, others are somewhat obscure.
Paul reveals something of the problem that faced him in his
attempt to reach as many persons as possible in his generation. “For though I be
free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain
the more. And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to
them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are
under the law; to them that are without law, as without law, … that I might gain
them that are without law. To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made
all things to all men, that I might by all means save some.” 1 Corinthians
9:19-22. A message to go to every nation, and tongue, and people must not be
built in a restricted manner. Many minds, talents, personalities, environments,
and lines of activity must lend their influence to make the message appealing to
so wide a field.
Men God Used
Among the workers for God there is a place for every kind of
person who is willing to let himself be used. Race, nationality, or environment
forms no barrier. Since our attention at present is focused on the Bible,
naturally most of the men considered will be Hebrews; but God is not limited
except as men disqualify themselves for His service.
The prophets did not differ greatly from other men. Even
Elijah, one of the two of whom it is recorded that he was taken to heaven
without seeing death, is spoken of by another prophet as “a man subject to like
passions as we are.” James 5:17. Paul and Barnabas placed themselves in that
same classification after the Lycaonians declared, “The gods are come down to us
in the likeness of men.” Acts 14:11. See verse 15. Not only were prophets
subject to like passions as we are, but, like Moses at Kadesh and David in his
dealings with Uriah the Hittite, at times they were overcome by temptation and
sinned against God. Elijah became discouraged and wished that he might die;
Jonah was despondent when his prediction was not fulfilled. Abraham twice
misrepresented his true relationship with Sarah because he was afraid. The list
might be extended, not to excuse similar sins in ourselves, but to show that God
does not create a special kind of man as a prophet. These were men among men
whom the Lord used as best He could.
One of the most notable characteristics of the Bible is that it
fits the needs of every individual in every generation. No one can justifiably say that because of the point of view from which it
was written it does not touch his case or problems. The true Author planned it
thus. Each book bears the marks of the background, education, personality, and
experience of its writer. Each portion of the record yields a richer harvest of
spiritual truth when we learn of the life of the man behind it. Without any
attempt at the moment to compare or contrast these lives, we will note something
of the background, lifework, and personality of some of these Bible prophets, so
we may see the variety of men God used to accomplish His purposes.
Abraham. Although Abraham wrote no book of the Bible, he
holds a prominent place in both Old and New Testament thinking. When the Lord
spoke to Abimelech, king of Gerar, in a dream He called Abraham a prophet.
Genesis 20:7. His name is used repeatedly in connection with the promises of
inheritance in the land of Canaan (Deuteronomy 1:8), the perpetuation of the
worship of the true God (Exodus 3:15), and the final inheritance of the whole
world by the righteous (Romans 4:13). Much of what was revealed to Abraham
through the prophetic gift seems to have been related to these three
thoughts.
Recent archaeological excavations have shown that Abraham's
home city, Ur of the Chaldees, was a wealthy city with a high degree of cultural
development. Abraham himself was probably well educated, and the Bible record
seems to indicate that the family was prosperous. Unfortunately some of the
members of the family fell into the idolatrous ways of the city, and even Terah,
Abraham's father, served other gods in Ur. Joshua 24:2. At an advanced age
Abraham was called to leave the culture and comparative ease of Ur and go into a
land of which he knew nothing. He was unaware of his goal, but he was ready to
follow God's leading.
Subsequent events reveal much of the character and personality
of this man who became “the Friend of God.” James 2:23.
He led his household in spiritual activities. His unselfishness is
demonstrated in his dealings with Lot. The firmness of his faith is commended in
Hebrews 11, despite the failures recorded in Genesis. God used him and his son
to give one of the clearest pictures of what the sacrifice of the Son of God
meant to both the Father and the Son. Abraham was widely and favorably known
among the surrounding tribes in Canaan. He was a man of stature and
influence.
Moses. Born into the home of slaves at a time when all
male children of the Israelites were condemned to die, Moses' life was protected
by the favor of the daughter of the pharaoh of Egypt. The child's early years
were spent in his own home, but his parents were constantly aware that soon he
would leave that home for the royal palace. Every effort was made to prepare him
to stand true in the time when he would be exposed to pagan customs, society,
and religion. Then came the years in the court of Egypt with their broad civil
and military training. Every enticement was offered the young adopted prince,
but he made his choice on the basis of eternal values rather than on the
fleeting “pleasures of sin.”
Principles of truth had become so firmly implanted in the life
of the young Moses that later influences could not turn him from them. Despite
Egypt's offers, Moses adhered to his faith in God. He was willing to risk
everything to accomplish what he thought God wanted him to do for the
deliverance of Israel from Egyptian bondage. His remarkable adaptability is
revealed in Exodus 2:21, describing Moses' attitude toward his life in the
wilderness after his escape from Egypt: “And Moses was content to dwell with the
man.” The change from the constant activity of the royal court and the army
headquarters to the quiet solitude of a desert dwelling would not have brought
contentment to many a man with the energy and capability of Moses. Few princes
of a powerful royal house would have been content to spend their days as
shepherds. Instead of attendants gratifying his every wish, he now cared for the needs of
a flock of sheep. His home was a tent instead of a palace. In these
circumstances Moses spent forty years under the tutorship of God to prepare him
to serve as leader of his people. All this background contributed to the
formation of an unusual type of character and personality. Moses came out of his
training period a kind, considerate, compassionate man with rare abilities as an
organizer, administrator, lawmaker, and judge. His dependence was on God, and
faith was a reality in his life.
Samuel. In his youth Samuel left his parents and home as
did Moses, but instead of being taken to the royal court of a pagan king this
boy went to live with the high priest at the sanctuary of God. Although the
environment would ordinarily be thought to be the best possible, it must be
remembered that Eli had utterly failed in the rearing of his own sons. The Lord
accused Eli of not restraining his sons and of honoring them above God. But
while he was still a child, Samuel grew in favor with both the Lord and men. As
the years passed, “all Israel from Dan even to Beersheba knew that Samuel was
established to be a prophet of the Lord.” 1 Samuel 3:20. Surrounded by the
obvious corruption existing in the lives of many of the priests, Samuel
maintained strict integrity and purity of character. Although he lacked the
firm, guiding hand of an earthly father, he developed into the strong man who
could in old age demand of the people: “Witness against me before the Lord, and
before His anointed: whose ox have I taken? or whose ass have I taken? or whom
have I defrauded? whom have I oppressed? or of whose hand have I received any
bribe to blind mine eyes therewith? and I will restore it you. And they said,
Thou hast not defrauded us, nor oppressed us, neither hast thou taken aught of
any man's hand.” 1 Samuel 12:3, 4.
As priest, prophet, and judge, Samuel had led the people
fairly, sympathetically, and honestly. Yet he had to listen to their demand for a king to be appointed over them, and at God's
direction he anointed the king. Instead of resenting the loss of authority, the
prophet became the friend and counselor of the new king; and he loved Saul like
a son. Samuel ranks high among the great men whose lives are pictured in the
Scriptures.
David. Were there no other characterization of David
than the words of Samuel, one might well visualize the kind of man he was. “The
Lord hath sought Him a man after His own heart, and the Lord hath commanded him
to be captain over His people.” 1 Samuel 13:14. As a young man, David enters the
Bible story when God directs Samuel to anoint him to be king over Israel. The
tales of his bravery in combat with wild animals and with men are well known.
His rise from shepherd to the throne was a perilous time, and it gave abundant
opportunity for him to develop strong traits of character and an abiding
confidence in God. Though filled with youthful enthusiasm and eager to press
forward, David was willing to wait for God to designate the time when he should
occupy the throne. He refused to take things into his own hands and kill Saul.
His later sin reveals the constant danger confronting even the most earnest
Christian. His recovery is a demonstration of the long-suffering of God and the
power of His grace.
Few men have shown a wider range of capabilities than David. As
musician, poet, singer, military man in both subordinate and commanding
positions, lawmaker, counselor, king, architect, organizer, and executive, he
revealed large native abilities well developed through education and experience.
His psalms indicate deep insight into the working of the human mind, a practical
knowledge of spiritual realities, and a personal acquaintance with God.
Amos. Under inspiration of the Spirit of God, a rugged
herdsman of Tekoa became a heroic messenger for the Lord. Amos must have led his
sheep over some of the same hills where David had spent his youth and where he had been a fugitive.
He was an outdoor man who had lacked the opportunity for education in the
schools of the prophets; but he was sturdy and fearless. Amos is a striking
example of the way God can take a man who is technically untrained and make him
an effective worker. Little is said of the man himself, but his words help us to
penetrate his thinking.
When Amaziah, the priest of Bethel, tried to send Amos home to
Judah to do his prophesying, the herdsman-prophet made no defense other than
that God had called him from the flock and had said, “Go, prophesy unto My
people Israel.” The prophet clearly implied that he was not in Israel from
personal choice, and that he would stay until his work was done, for God had
sent him. See Amos 7:10-17. His knowledge of outdoor life echoes in figures of
speech through the book, and the type of illustrations reveal the mind of the
man. The tempest and whirlwind (1:14), the height of the cedar, the strength of
the oak (2:9), the cart full of sheaves (2:13), the lion roaring in the forest
(3:4), the bird in the snare (3:5), the remains of a sheep snatched from a lion
(3:12), the kine of Bashan (4:1), the palmerworm and the drought (4:7-10),
proclaim the individualistic thinking, the powers of observation, and the
spiritual insight of the prophet. Much of this grew out of his early training
and environment. The response of the man to the call of God, and the brilliant
way in which he discharged his responsibility place him high in the ranks of a
notable company of men of God.
Daniel. “And the king spake unto Ashpenaz the master of
his eunuchs, that he should bring certain of the children of Israel, and of the
king's seed, and of the princes; children in whom was no blemish, but well
favored, and skillful in all wisdom, and cunning in knowledge, and understanding
science, and such as had ability in them to stand in the king's palace, and whom
they might teach the learning and the tongue of the Chaldeans.” Daniel 1:3, 4. Little needs to be added to this
Spirit-prompted characterization to gain a picture of the kind of person Daniel
was. Handsome of feature, sturdy of body, brilliant of mind, he received the
best education available to a Hebrew lad of the royal line. His mind was stored
with the Scriptures, and his character developed in harmony with its
principles.
In Babylon, Daniel rose from the status of prisoner of war to
prime minister, and he held that position under the kings of two rival empires.
His firmness to principle has become proverbial; his wisdom and tact command
respect. From our point of view it is almost inconceivable that a man who, on
the night of the collapse of the Babylonian kingdom was its “third ruler”
(Daniel 5:29), should soon afterward be made chief aide to its conqueror. “It
pleased Darius to set over the kingdom an hundred and twenty princes, which
should be over the whole kingdom; and over these three presidents; of whom
Daniel was first…. Then this Daniel was preferred above the presidents and
princes, because an excellent spirit was in him; and the king thought to set him
over the whole realm.” Daniel 6:1-3. Because of their association with Daniel,
mighty rulers were led to acknowledge the power of Daniel's God. “The king
[Nebuchadnezzar] answered unto Daniel, and said, Of a truth it is, that your God
is a God of gods, and a Lord of kings, and a revealer of secrets.” Daniel 2:47.
“Then King Darius wrote unto all people, nations, and languages…. I make a
decree, That in every dominion of my kingdom men tremble and fear before the God
of Daniel: for He is the living God, and steadfast forever, and His kingdom that
which shall not be destroyed, and His dominion shall be even unto the end.”
Daniel 6:25, 26.
Through this man, whose confidence in God remained unwavering
whether he faced monarchs or lions or enemies in high places, the Lord chose to
reveal long-term prophecies that reach from Daniel's time to the day when “the
kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole
heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the Most High.” Daniel
7:27. His character ranks him among the noblest of the royal line of the kingdom
of God. His revelations classify him as unsurpassed in importance among the
prophets. His unchanging constancy in the things of God, his control of his
mental and physical powers, his dignity and courtesy, set him before us as an
exemplar among men and prophets.
Paul. A “Hebrew of the Hebrews,” “a Pharisee, the son of
a Pharisee,” was the way Paul described his ancestry and religion. Paul knew no
method of working other than to throw every energy into doing the task at hand.
Study in the school of Gamaliel, persecution of the hated Christians, as the
apostle to the Gentiles, preaching Christ—each, in turn, received the same
fervent devotion. His brilliant mind, superior education, pure Hebrew ancestry,
Roman citizenship, thorough conversion, and unflagging zeal made Paul the kind
of man God could use for one of the most difficult tasks ever to face any
man—introducing Christianity to the Gentile world.
Of all Christian preachers, other than the Saviour Himself,
Paul has commanded the greatest respect. His clear grasp of the principles of
righteousness by faith in contrast with attempts to be saved as a reward for
good works grew out of the two phases of his own life experience, as a Pharisee
and as a servant of Jesus Christ. His ability as preacher, teacher, and
apologist sets him apart from the preacher multitude, and declares him to be in
a classification where he has few companions. His fearlessness and
conclusiveness in dealing with heresies left both legalists and antinomians with
little argument to support them. Paul might well have added to his description
of himself that he was “a preacher of preachers,” and the “teacher of
teachers.”
These few incomplete biographical notes are intended to
start the thinking of the student upon the men God chose to serve
Him as prophets. Nothing in a man's background, education, or occupation in
itself excluded him from being called to the sacred office. In fact, it appears
that it was part of God's plan to choose men from as wide a range of heritages
and as diverse characteristics as possible in order to make an appeal with the
gospel message to every kind of mind. The man's nature and personality in no
wise altered the import of his message or the fact of its inspiration.
Function of the Prophets
What use did God make of these men of diversified talents,
experience, training, and education? What was the range of the activities of
prophets in carrying out their prophetic function? In consideration of the
exercise of the prophetic gift, attention has been focused so largely on the
element of prediction that many times the broader aspects of the function of the
prophets have been obscured or entirely lost from view. Theirs was a
broad work, by no means restricted to foretelling the future. These were
men who filled an important place in the history of God's people, not only
because of their multiplied responsibilities in the community or nation, but
because of the nature of the messages sent to the people through them. Not only
were they used to reach the professed people of God; they were delegated to
carry the word of the Lord to the world.
Spoke for God. The primary reason for the calling of a
prophet was that he might serve as a mouthpiece for God. He was to say to the
people what God would say if He should veil His glory and come personally among
them as a man. The people's needs were numerous and diverse. Messages
were needed by individuals, families, cities, and nations. To God's
personal representative, the prophet, was entrusted the responsibility of
delivering the messages. Revealed God's purposes. “Surely the Lord God will do
nothing, but He revealeth His secret unto His servants the prophets.” Amos 3:7.
In the purposes of God, His plans are revealed to His people so that they might
know how to co-operate with them. Long ago Christians would have given up in
despair had it not been for the assurance, “I will come again.” John 14:3. To
the Old Testament believer the promise of the coming Messiah was his sustenance
when he saw the sin of his nation and the decay of its leadership. To the
bitterly disappointed and disillusioned Israelites in Babylonian captivity
Jeremiah's prediction of deliverance at the conclusion of seventy years of
bondage was a star of hope. Insight into God's purposes for the future was
intended to strengthen and encourage, to fortify and prepare men and women to
meet the crisis. There were times when the most courageous hearts would have
failed had it not been for the repeated assurances of the Lord's purpose to
bring deliverance.
Because God can penetrate the future and man cannot, the Lord
has used His knowledge of the future as one of the evidences that He is God. The
striking nature of the predictions has directed such attention to them that
other, equally important, phases of the work of the prophets have received scant
thought. To many, “prophet” connotes “predictor.” When one recognizes the
broader nature of the prophets' work he gains a better understanding of God's
plan and has a deeper confidence in it.
Strengthened and guided rulers. An Assyrian army over
which Sennacherib had placed Rabshakeh (Isaiah 36:2) surrounded the city of
Jerusalem. Rabshakeh mocked Hezekiah and scorned the God of Israel. Hezekiah in
his terror and grief sent a group to talk with Isaiah and to seek counsel from
the Lord through the prophet. “And Isaiah said unto them, Thus shall ye say unto
your master, Thus saith the Lord, Be not afraid of the words that thou hast
heard, wherewith the servants of the king of Assyria have blasphemed Me. Behold, I will send a blast
upon him, and he shall hear a rumor [report], and return to his own land; and I
will cause him to fall by the sword in his own land.” Isaiah 37:6, 7.
How courage and strength must have surged through Hezekiah when
his servants hurried back with the word, “Thus saith the Lord, Be not afraid.”
Had there been no explanation of the Lord's plan attached to the message,
Hezekiah would have been strengthened by the assurance that the Lord had
promised to be with him in the crisis.
When David decided that he wanted to build a house for the
Lord, he talked his plan over with Nathan the prophet. Nathan instantly agreed
that the plan was a wise one, and he encouraged David to go forward with it. But
this was not according to God's purpose, and that night the Lord spoke to Nathan
and told him to give David the message that his son was to build the Lord's
house. 2 Samuel 7. The word of the prophet was accepted as the word of the Lord
to guide the king, and his cherished plan was abandoned. David's disappointment
was at least partly relieved by the fact that he was permitted to gather
materials for the temple, even though he was not to undertake its building. 1
Chronicles 22:14.
In war or peace, prosperity or adversity, the leaders who
wished counsel might have it. Unfortunately many sought no help, and others to
whom it was sent rejected it. Men in places of leadership were particular
objects of God's concern. He made every approach possible to reach them and to
give them the aid He knew they needed, even if they recognized no need
themselves. He wanted them to be steadfast in their allegiance to Him and in
upholding the high principles of the theocratic government. He desired to direct
them so that they would make no mistakes in their leadership. With such backing
and counsel, every one of the kings of ancient Israel might have made his reign
an outstanding success and the people would have been greatly blessed.
Encouraged the people to faithfulness. “If ye forsake
the Lord,” Joshua warned the people shortly before his death, “and serve strange
gods, then He will turn and do you hurt, and consume you, after that He hath
done you good…. Now therefore put away, said he, the strange gods which are
among you, and incline your heart unto the Lord God of Israel.” Joshua
24:20-23.
“Be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of
life.” Revelation 2:10. This was the Lord's encouraging message to His faithful
children as given through John the revelator.
“He that is faithful in that which is least is faithful also in
much.” Luke 16:10. “Well done, thou good and faithful servant” were the words of
the greatest of the prophets. Matthew 25:21.
Frequently words of encouragement are interwoven with reproofs
and rebukes; seldom are they found standing alone. There are always new steps
forward to be taken by God's people. One of the leading activities of the
prophets was to encourage the people to hold fast the ground they had already
gained and press on to new accomplishments. Every forward step meant that some
fault needed to be overcome, some weakness strengthened, some desire subdued.
Encouragement could in no way be separated from the instruction and reproof that
also came through the messengers.
Protested against evils. Whether their burden was to
resist social injustice, to root out idolatry, or to protest against immorality,
the prophets were equally vigorous in their approaches. At times it seemed to
the prophet that no other dissenting voice than his was raised, but in such a
case his responsibility was increased rather than lessened. The prophet's
protests were God's protests, and were delivered regardless of consequences.
“Woe to them that devise iniquity, and work evil upon their
beds! when the morning is light, they practice it, because it is in the power of
their hand. And they covet fields, and take them by violence; and houses, and take them away: so they oppress a
man and his house, even a man and his heritage. Therefore thus saith the Lord;
Behold, against this family do I devise an evil, from which ye shall not remove
your necks.” Micah 2:1-3.
“Will a man rob God? Yet ye have robbed Me. But ye say, Wherein
have we robbed Thee? In tithes and offerings…. Bring ye all the tithes into the
storehouse, that there may be meat in Mine house.” Malachi 3:8-10.
“Hear the word of the Lord, ye children of Israel: for the Lord
hath a controversy with the inhabitants of the land, because there is no truth,
nor mercy, nor knowledge of God in the land. By swearing, and lying, and
killing, and stealing, and committing adultery, they break out, and blood
toucheth blood.” Hosea 4:1, 2.
In imagination we can see the prophets standing alone, as did
Jesus in the court of the temple, proclaiming: “Take these things hence; make
not My Father's house an house of merchandise.” John 2:16. Usually their words
of protest were not their own, but were prefaced with “Thus saith the Lord.”
Perhaps they would not have had courage to speak out if it had been left to
their own initiative, but as God's spokesmen they could not refrain. At one time
Jeremiah decided that he would speak no more. “Then I said, I will not make
mention of Him, nor speak any more in His name. But His word was in mine heart
as a burning fire shut up in my bones, and I was weary with forbearing, and I
could not stay.” Jeremiah 20:9. Evil was rampant in Israel and Judah during the
lifetime of most of the prophets, and through these men the Lord maintained a
constant protest against corrupt practices and personal sins.
Directed activities. Destruction and building were both
essential parts of the work of a prophet. The dual responsibility is well
expressed in the Lord's commission to Jeremiah: “See, I have this day set thee
over the nations and over the kingdoms, to root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to throw down,
to build, and to plant.” Jeremiah 1:10. Many a modern city is engaged in a
slum-clearing project in which handsome buildings replace dilapidated tenements.
First, the ground must be cleared of the old before the new can be built.
Tearing down is as essential as building up. Although it may appear that the
words of the prophets were more of tearing down than of building, it must be
remembered that this task had to be performed repeatedly. It is easier to allow
a building to slip into decay than it is to keep it new in appearance. Each time
the old timbers must be removed and replaced before more new building can be
done. In every forward move in God's work the prophets were present, either in
positions of leadership or in close counsel with the leaders.
As a prophet, Moses directed the building of the sanctuary. The
Holy Spirit, through whom the prophets were guided, gave David detailed plans
for the construction of the house of God that became Solomon's temple. 1
Chronicles 28:11, 12. In the days of the rebuilding of the temple, after the
Babylonian exile, “Then rose up Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, and Jeshua the
son of Jozadak, and began to build the house of God which is at Jerusalem: and
with them were the prophets of God helping them.” Ezra 5:2. On the Day of
Pentecost the spirit of prophecy possessed the apostles and directed them in the
establishment of the early Christian church. Paul was called to enter new
territory and to open new areas for the preaching of the gospel. He went forward
or held back as the Spirit indicated that he should do.
It is not difficult to trace through the Old and New Testaments
the direct influence of the prophets in the constructive activities of God's
people. The tragedy of the situation is that their counsel was seldom fully
heeded. Had the instruction of the Lord, given through the prophets, been
followed, the neighbors of Israel would have said, “Surely this great nation is
a wise and understanding people.” Deuteronomy 4:6.
Taught. The prophets were not classroom teachers as
such, although some of them seem to have taught in this fashion. However, it was
through them that the people learned the principles of the kingdom of heaven.
They made plain the high standard required of all God's people. Their sermons
were teaching sermons, filled with practical, helpful instruction. So fully does
the Bible, given through the prophets, set forth the kind of life and character
exemplified by Christ that it shares with Him the name “the Word.” Precept is
laid upon precept, and line is added to line to round out the concept of a godly
life. In true teaching fashion, problems are approached repeatedly from a
variety of angles so that none need fail to understand how to apply the
principles in his own life. To give this instruction to all generations “holy
men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.” 2 Peter 1:21.
Other responsibilities. It can also be shown that the
men God chose as prophets served their nation as consultants and counselors for
every phase of individual and national activity. In addition, they gave warnings
of what would result from certain courses of action. They reproved sin in
individuals and in the nation as a whole. They pronounced the judgments of God
as consequences of sinful policies and evil conduct. There was no matter too
small or too large to warrant the attention of God through the prophet, no
corner so dark that light could not penetrate it and help be given. At times the
performance of miracles figured prominently, as in the days of Elisha. Again,
the preaching ministry was outstanding, as in the experience of Samuel and
Jeremiah. Under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, these men did all the things
that needed to be done. They were serving in God's stead, speaking for Him,
acting for Him, representing Him before their fellow men.
The ministry of the prophets was not limited to the Hebrew
nations. Through some of the prophetic messengers the Lord tried to win the
Gentile nations to the truth. Abraham was sent to witness for the true God in Egypt, where multiplied deities were
worshiped. At least partly because of the failure of Abraham it was necessary
for the Lord to send Joseph, and later to raise up Moses to give the Egyptians
opportunity to learn of the true God. The story of Jonah is highlighted by the
repentance of Nineveh in response to the preaching of the reluctant prophet.
Daniel's prophetic ministry led to his elevation to one of the highest positions
in Babylon, and resulted ultimately in the conversion of its greatest monarch.
In freedom or captivity Paul reached out into Asia Minor, Greece, some of the
Mediterranean islands, and Rome. All these and others, undoubtedly many
unmentioned in the Bible, touched the lives of the nations with the word of the
Lord. “Go ye into all the world” is not only a last-day injunction; it has been
the Lord's objective for His people in every generation.
Prophets, then, were not unlike other men. They were men who
needed the converting power of the Holy Spirit, who struggled with the
temptations that are common to men, and they sometimes lost the battle in their
own lives. They were men whose sorrows affected their lives as deeply as ours
move us. They married, reared families, taught their children and learned from
them, rejoiced in their triumphs, and grieved over their failures. They knew
what it meant to see beloved children turn from the Lord. At least one knew what
it meant to have an unfaithful wife. Another was not permitted to grieve over
the death of his wife. They became weary and discouraged as did other men, and
at times they chafed under the tasks the Lord gave them.
If you had lived in ancient Palestine, a prophet might have
been your father. If so, he would have held you on his knee, smiled at you,
talked to you, played with you as fathers always have. Or he might have been
your next-door neighbor with whom you would have visited while he hoed his
garden. Or you might have climbed trees with him when he and you were
boys.
At the same time prophets were men in whom the Lord placed
great confidence. A sense of responsibility weighed heavily on them. Whether
they came from the royal palace, the plow, the herd, or the service of the
temple, an inner compulsion made it impossible for them ever to be unconscious
of their calling. These prophets were carefully chosen with attention given to
their talents, weaknesses, and mental quirks. They were individuals whose
personalities might be classified today as introverted or extroverted. Sometimes
the tasks to which they were called were extremely distasteful to them, but God
knew His men and used them to the extent of their abilities, even empowering
them to go beyond what they or we would consider possible.
These little insights lurk everywhere through the Scriptures.
When we find them, they make the men of the Bible, and the Bible itself, warmer
and more alive. They enable us to put ourselves into the Bible picture to see
how we belong to it and it to us. Far from taking away any of the dignity of the
men or the solemnity of their messages, these pictures open doors of
understanding that might otherwise be closed permanently to us. If we consider
the ministry of Jesus, and then try to understand how God called men in many
generations from all walks of life, and sought to accomplish through them as
much as possible the same kind of ministry that Jesus performed, we will begin
to gain a more adequate view of the significance and function of the Bible
prophets.
SELECTED REFERENCES
Daniells, A. G., The Abiding Gilt of Prophecy, pp.
36-172.
Haynes, Carlyle B., The Book of All Nations, pp. 63-72.
Von Orelli, C., “Prophecy,” The International Standard Bible
Encyclopedia, vol. 4, PP. 2459-2466. (See also articles under names of
prophets.)
CONTINUE CH.4
TOC