[239]

Section Titles

Throughout the long, dismal centuries of papal dominion,
covering the Middle Ages, which we have traversed in these studies, the Bible
was kept locked in the Latin tongue, or in the original Hebrew and Greek in
which it had been written. Thus it was unavailable to the masses in their mother
tongue. Its study was not encouraged, and especially was delving into its
prophecies regarded unprofitable and improper.
The unspiritual ecclesiastics were baffled by the mystic
symbolism of the prophetic books of Daniel and John. But this obscurity served
as a divinely appointed means of preserving the prophetic word. The real intent
of these messages from God was providentially concealed by these very symbols in
the days when the truth of God was well-nigh suppressed among men.
But in time the Spirit-impelled Wycliffe began to translate
the Scriptures into the language of the people, and to encourage their reading
and study. By the time of the flood tide of the Reformation, Luther and others
brought forth the Bible in several of the common languages. Once again the
Scriptures were lifted to their rightful place as the very word of God. They
were accepted as the foundation of all true faith and doctrine, the arbiter for
every theological difference, and the end of all controversy. They were exalted
as revealing the mind and lofty purpose of God. They were received as recording
the past without error, and as divinely portraying the present and the future.
As a result of the Reformation, the veil that had obscured
the hallowed pages of Holy Writ began to be lifted. There soon came a wide rift
in the cloud that concealed its divine symbols, and the simpler and more
fundamental of the outlines of prophecy began to be understood and explained.
Noted scholars like the illustrious Joseph Mede (1586-1638), who made long
strides in reviving interest in prophecy and laying the foundations for sound
interpretation; the celebrated dissenter, Thomas Goodwin (1600-1680), who
advocated the indispensable “year-day” principle
[240]
of interpretation; the great
philosopher and scientist, Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727), whose understanding of
the prophetic symbols was remarkably clear for the time in which he lived and
wrote; and Johann Albrecht Bengel, the eminent German theologian—these were
among the great pioneer students and interpreters of Bible prophecy in the
seventeenth century, and on to the threshold of the eighteenth.
Slowly the list grows throughout the eighteenth century,
until we come to the predicted “time of the end,” concerning which it was
foretold that men should run “to and fro” in the “book” of Daniel that had been
“sealed” until the hour should come for those features of its divine message,
applicable to the last days, to be understood and applied. There then followed a
most remarkable bursting forth of exposition of Bible prophecy. Thus it came
literally to pass that men “ran” to and fro in the prophecy, comparing part with
part and principle with principle.
With the dawn of the nineteenth century there came a
spontaneous awakening in several continents, and in both hemispheres. This
centred in the recovery of the lost expectation of Christ's second advent, as
based on the predictions of these same prophets. In South America, under Lacunza, the pathfinding book, “The Coming of the Messiah,” appeared, and was
translated into the leading languages of Europe.
One compiler made an amazing list of twenty-one hundred
writers whose articles or treatises on prophecy were issued in English, French,
and German, during the years from the Protestant Reformation up to 1835,—with
most of them appearing near the close, within the indicated “time of the
end.”
Thus the advent hope was revived in the hearts of multitudes
by the predicted study of the prophecies. This, in turn, led to the deepest
searching of heart as people who understood and believed the prophecies prepared
to meet their God. Hans Wood, Lewis Way, Archibald Mason, James Hatley Frere,
Edward Irving, Joseph Wolff, Henry Drummond, Robert Chalmers,
[241]
James Begg, and Matthew Habershon, McNeil, Pym, Hutchinson,
Bayford, Frye, Noel, Vaughan, and Cuninghame are but a few out of the galaxy of
names in Great Britain. Thus an amazing prophetic literature was developed in
the Old World.
In North America, Miller, Litch, Hale, Himes, and many less
conspicuous men wrote out and preached their convictions upon the prophecies. It
was here that the advent movement came to its glorious culmination for the time,
as setting forth the near return of Christ.
In Great Britain a remarkable event took place in connection
with the names, mentioned in that country. More than a score of these godly,
learned men—mostly ministers from the various churches—had begun to study and to
write upon the prophecies of Daniel and the Revelation. Feeling the need of
exchanging thought upon these subjects of common interest, and of counselling
upon their common problems, a Prophetic Conference was called to meet in 1826,
at the home of Henry Drummond, M. P., at Albury Park, Surrey. Over twenty of
these expounders of prophecy were assembled there. They spent eight days in
earnest study. Their conclusions were embodied in a remarkable three volume
report. They were united in expecting the Lord to come within a very few years.
Representing, as they did, different denominational viewpoints on the topics
under study, the united conclusions reached on the imminence of the second
advent are nothing short of amazing.
Following the principle of interpretation laid down by Hans
Wood of Rossmead, Ireland, in 1787, they concluded that the “seventy weeks” of
Daniel 9:24 were indeed “cut off” from the beginning of the 2300 days of Daniel
8:14. In other words, they understood them to begin simultaneously, the “seventy
weeks,” or 490 literal years, comprising the first section of the full period,
which they understood would terminate between 1843 and 1847. They further
understood that the midst of the seventieth week—the cutting off of the Messiah
for the sins of the people—sealed
[242]
with divine certainty forever the beginning and, consequently,
the ending of the full prophetic time period, the longest recorded in the Bible.
This principle of interpretation was accepted and proclaimed
by a score or more of outstanding British students of prophecy during the first
three decades of the nineteenth century. Recent research has brought to light a
literature remarkably penetrating and clear on the precise date of the ending of
the 2300 years.
In the second decade of the nineteenth century, William
Miller came independently to essentially the same conclusion in North America.
Miller began public presentation of his convictions about 1831. He was soon
joined by Fitch, Litch, Bates, Himes, and Bliss.
This stalwart band in America, increased rapidly by others,
began to witness with a power and to an extent that are an astonishment to all
who learn the facts. Beginning in the smaller towns, their message soon
permeated the great cities. Books, tracts, and then periodicals were published
in increasing number until there were more than forty papers issued in the
United States, Canada, and Great Britain, prior to October 22, 1844, devoted
exclusively to heralding the approaching advent.
Public lecturers grew in number, drawn from the ministry of
nearly all Protestant denominations. “Conferences” of Christians “expecting the
advent” began to be held in 1840,—general conferences for the public
representatives, and local conferences for the laity. There were nearly a dozen
of the former, and about forty of the latter, which were in instances attended
by as many as two thousand persons. Important actions were passed by these
general conferences that moulded, unified, and greatly forwarded the whole
movement.
Giant “camp meetings” were held, with thousands in
attendance,—thirty-one being held within the space of four months, in 1842,
including several in Canada. One hundred twenty-four of these were held during
1843 and 1844, fourteen of which were
[243]
held in Great Britain. “Tabernacle” meetings and “grove,” or open
air, meetings were also employed.
Then, resentment, ecclesiastical action, and persecution on
the part of the nominal churches came into the picture to complicate and impede.
Thus we come to the end of Miller's predicted time—March 21,
1844, the close of “the Jewish year 1843.” There was keen disappointment that
the Lord did not appear at that time, and there was considerable shrinkage in
numbers as the more superficial dropped out.
The advent movement then entered a period of indifference
called “the slumber time.” But in August, at the important Exeter, New
Hampshire, camp meeting, evidence was presented that explained the error in time
calculation by Miller. It was seen that 2300 full years would reach from the
autumn of 457 B. C. to the autumn of 1844 A. D. The parable of the virgins
helped to explain the nature of the disappointment. On the basis of the types in
the sanctuary system of old, the antitypical Day of Atonement would fall on the
tenth day of the Jewish seventh month,—or, according to modern reckoning, on
October 22, 1844.
This gripping truth swept over the advent hosts with a
compulsion that carried all before it. Louder and louder swelled the cry, “The
Bridegroom cometh; go ye out to meet Him.” By voice and pen, men told of the
expected Saviour. Public lecturers increased to the number of two thousand.
The advent presses began to run day and night to turn out the
literature that flooded the country. Some of these periodicals were monthlies;
others, weeklies; and, in instances, a few were published every other day, or
even daily. They were hawked in the streets of the cities. They were sent in
bundles to every post office in the country, and on shipboard to all the ports
of earth.
The country was shaken by the mighty message. The Lord was
expected. The dead were to be raised, the living saints translated, and the
earth—then thought to be the sanctuary—was
[244]
to be cleansed by fire, and so to become the abode of the saints
forever. With holy joy men laboured to spread the solemn warning and appeal.
With deep searching they examined their own hearts for lurking sin and
selfishness. They sold their possessions to obtain funds to spread the message
of the expected King of kings. They believed so earnestly and honestly in their
expectations that they left their crops standing unharvested, their potatoes in
the ground undug. Such was the actual hope and sincere expectancy as October 22
drew on.
Never was there a more thorough preparation made to meet God.
For ascension to meet their Lord they sought the spotless robe of Christ's
righteousness; and for heart preparation, the forgiveness of God's grace. The
great day drew on. The last paper was mailed out. The last sermon was preached.
The last appeal was made. The last prayer was offered. Their work was done! Only
the coming of their Lord, they thought, stood between them and their fondest
expectations.
They waited,—hopefully, solemnly. But to their utter
consternation, their anguish, and bewilderment, the appointed day passed.
Disappointment filled their souls. In a daze they sought
their bearings. They earnestly reviewed the past. They resurveyed the prophetic
waymarks. The date 457 B. C. stood supported by reverent scholarship in Ireland,
Scotland, England, continental Europe, as well as in North Africa. They traced
anew the conclusions of Wood, Mason, Way, Frere, Irving, Wolff, McNeil, White,
Pym, Cuninghame, Drummond, Habershon, Miller, and the many others who had
declared the seventy prophetic weeks were cut off from the 2300 years, and,
commencing together, constituted the first 490 years of that period with
Christ's crucifixion in the midst of the seventieth week to seal the prophecy
infallibly, and so to fix its termination.
On the basis of the types and the typical Day of Atonement,
the great prophetic period must end on October 22, as they had
[245]
calculated. But their Lord had not come. The future was a blank,
and the present was a puzzle. Sneers and taunts, hostility and persecution,
greeted them on every hand. It was a terrible disappointment, a dagger thrust
into their hearts. The meaning of it all, and the emergence from their
misunderstanding, must be held for consideration in another chapter.
But there was another factor to be logically anticipated in
the advent movement at this point, in view of the uniform experience of the
past. With the great revival of neglected truth there had early come into the
hearts of many a conviction that the apostolic gifts should appear with
the renewal of the apostolic faith. Such persons prayed much about it, and wrote
about it, but as yet they had no clear understanding of it.
Let us pause, for a moment here, to look at another side of
the picture. Satan, the relentless opposer of every truth and provision of God,
not only knows well these uniform operations of the past as regards the gift of
prophecy,—such as have been traced through the pages of this volume,—but he has
long known and hated God's promised restoration of the gift to the remnant
church. This bestowal by our heavenly Father was for the purpose of counselling,
guiding, and steadying His loyal followers through the unprecedented perils and
apostasies of the last hour.
The archenemy of God is, alas, a keener student of divine
prophecy than are most men—even many within the church. He knows and fears God's
power from of old. His is the fury of desperation. He uses this evil knowledge
and long experience in an attempt to thwart the acceptance of God's provisions,
so far as lies within his power. This is attempted with the spirit of prophecy,
for example, by anticipating its appearance according to promise, and producing
preliminary counterfeits to deceive, if possible, the expectant ones. By extreme
fanaticism and false manifestations, he seeks to disgust men generally, and thus
to frustrate the purpose of the gift. In this way he causes disrepute to be cast
upon all manifestations of the gift, true or false, and
[246]
renders it difficult to credit the true when its appearance is
made. It is his age-old scheme of opposition.
Thus it came literally to pass in the days of the English
advent movement. When the expectation of the Saviour's appearance failed, a
brilliant leader like Edward Irving, dissatisfied with the formalism of the
nominal churches, and looking for the manifestation of the gifts, withdrew from
the ecclesiastical body with which he had been connected. But he was faced with
strange manifestations in his own congregation, so that he died in bewilderment
and disappointment.
But this enmity on the part of Satan, together with the
object of his subtle attacks, and his final course of action, were not only all
fully foreknown to God, but were foretold in prophetic outline for the knowledge
and safeguarding of His people. Hence confusion or deception was neither
necessary nor inevitable.
In North America the publication of alleged visions in
certain of the advent journals led to recorded actions against all “visions.”
Thus from Charles Fitch's periodical, The Second Advent of Christ,
published in Cleveland, Ohio, in a “Declaration of Principles” adopted “By the
Adventists Assembled in Boston Anniversary Week, May, 1843,” and signed by “N.
N. Whiting, S. Bliss, T. F. Barry, J. Litch, and C. Fitch,” we read:
“We have no confidence whatever in visions, dreams, or
private revelations. ‘What is the chaff to the wheat? saith the Lord.’ We
repudiate all fanaticism, and everything which may tend to extravagance, excess,
and immorality, that shall cause our good to be evil spoken of.”—Issue of
June 21, 1843.
A little later, John Starkweather, well educated and able
speaker—the ministerial associate of J. V. Himes in his Boston church—looked for
the restoration of the gifts. But fanaticism came briefly, though locally, in
the years 1843 and 1844, to deceive and disappoint his immediate followers.
Finally, in direct connection with the great expectation of
October 22, 1844, an extremist on the fringes of Millerism, by
[247]
the name of Dr. C. R. Gorgas, claimed that by “vision” God had
“commissioned” him to call out the faithful from Philadelphia to a camp outside
the city, and on printed handbills predicted that Christ would come at three
o'clock in the morning.
This wild move created disgust, and brought forth emphatic
repudiation by the leaders of the movement, immediately following the
disappointment, as these words testify:
“The Encampment!!!—It seems to be a common impression
that this was the result of our doctrine. By no means. Only from one to two
hundred, out of nearly three thousand believers (at Philadelphia) were deluded
by this. The rest felt that they were not required to do anything of the kind;
but saw that those favourable to it were led astray, and were grossly perverting
the Scriptures. The arrangements for the encampment were made so hastily that
those opposed had no opportunity to consider and try to counteract it. Now for
the origin of this measure a Dr. C. R. Gorgas of York County, in this State,
pretended to have been inspired about three weeks ago, and that it was revealed
to him that the advent would take place at three o'clock in the morning of the
22d. Charts to this effect were sent to Baltimore and to this city. The
brethren in both places immediately opposed it. Dr. Gorgas first went to
Baltimore, but gained no converts. He then came to this city, and from that time
the meetings here lost much of their solemnity and interest…. Joshua V. Himes,
the chief publisher of advent papers, came to this city and strongly opposed Dr.
Gorgas, as also Josiah Litch, well known as one of the first and most prominent
among the advent preachers…. Brother Himes also went to New York and arrested
the publication there of the Doctor's chart, which the New York brother, before
mentioned, had commenced. The five or six converts here, were also distributing
his charts very freely, and the public therefore receives the impression that
these charts set forth the expectation of second advent believers generally, who
on the contrary rejected in toto the pretended inspiration.
“Now this Dr. Gorgas professed to have a revelation that
destruction was to be as in the days of Lot, and that all who would be saved
must flee from the cities. The influence he had exerted over a few, and then
their influence over others, led to the encampment—a most unhappy step
[248]
—over which none can grieve more bitterly than the advent
preachers and advent believers generally. It was the result of following a mere
man, instead of the inspired word of the living God. Thanks be to Him for His
unerring word; and thanks be to Him also for keeping the great body of those who
love His appearing from being led astray by such an unholy influence. Lewis C.
Gunn.”—The Midnight Cry, Nov. 7, 1844, p. 147.
At the Mutual Conference of Adventists at Albany, New York,
called for April 29, 1845, a committee of twelve was appointed to draw up “a
plan of future operations” and to “present a declaration of principles in the
defence of which we have laboured, and consult respecting our future
association.” In the series of resolutions submitted and “adopted without a
dissenting voice,” was this significant action, the import of which is very
easily discernible:
“Whereas, In every great religious movement, there have been
among the wise and sober-minded advocates of the truth, others who have risen
up, striving about words to no profit, but to the subverting of the hearers,
making great pretensions to special illumination … and whereas, in
connection with the doctrine of Christ's near appearing, as in all previous
religious movements, some of this class have risen up, calling themselves
Adventists, teaching for doctrines that with which we can have no sympathy or
fellowship, with many unseemly practices, whereby the word of God has been
dishonoured, and the doctrine of Christ's appearing brought into contempt;
therefore—
“Resolved, That we can have no sympathy or fellowship
with those things which have only a show of wisdom in will worship and
neglecting of the body, after the commandments and doctrines of men. That we
have no fellowship with any of the new tests as conditions of salvation,
in addition to repentance toward God, and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, and a
looking for and loving His appearing. That we have no fellowship for Jewish
fables and commandments of men, that turn from the truth, or for any of the
distinctive characteristics of modern Judaism.”—The Advent Herald, and Signs
of the Times Reporter, May 14, 1845, p. 107.
At the New York City Conference, May 6, 1845, the “Doings of
the Mutual General Conference held at Albany, which commenced
[249]
April 29th, 1845,” “were unanimously
approved.” After Sylvester Bliss, who was a member of the Albany Committee of
twelve, had declared that the “Gorgas affair” he “regarded nothing but
mesmerism,” and had referred to it as “the delusion of the Gorgas vision,” the
following action was passed at New York:
“Resolved, That we have no confidence in any new
messages, visions, dreams, tongues, miracles, extraordinary gifts, revelations,
impressions, discerning of spirits, or teachings, etc., etc., not in accordance
with the unadulterated word of God.”—The Advent Herald, May 21, 1845, p. 118.
Finally at the important Boston Conference, May 26, Josiah
Litch said:
“With regard to the state of things in Philadelphia. A
portion had been induced, contrary to all his remonstrances, to obey the vision
of Dr. Gorgas, and fled from the city on the 10th of the 7th month. And some of
them had not yet been able to get the hallucination from their minds. The
results had been most disastrous. It had served to disgust the mind of the
community there, so that they were labouring under the greatest
embarrassments.”—The Advent Herald, and Signs of the Times Reporter, June 4,
1845, p. 135.
Then as a conference they declared:
“We are happy to accord our most hearty approval of the
doings of the late Mutual Conference at Albany. The important truths there
expressed, we regard as scriptural, and are the ones for the maintenance of
which we have laboured from the beginning.”—Idem.
These actions were taken by the First-Day group of
Adventists. This body stood in contradistinction to the group beginning to
accept the seventh-day Sabbath truth and, shortly thereafter, the sanctuary
light. It should be distinctly understood in this connection that this minority
group of Adventists, because of accepting the true Sabbath of the Bible, and
because of their better understanding of the second advent of Christ through the
ministration in the heavenly sanctuary, came to be known later,
[250]
and now continue to be known, as Seventh-day Adventists. They
should in no way be confused with the First-day Adventists, who were in the
majority at that time, and who have continued to the present day, though now in
far smaller number than the Seventh-day Adventists.
From the historical incidents recited above, it can be
clearly seen that we are brought, amid unfavourable circumstances, to the
divinely appointed hour when the true gift of prophecy was to be manifest in the
remnant church that had just begun to stress “the commandments of God, and the
faith of Jesus.” Its beginning was under the severe handicap of prejudice,
adverse conference actions by the main body of Adventists, and popular disgust
over manifestly false visions fostered by the evil one to hamper the true
manifestation that had just made its appearance. This true manifestation came at
the appointed hour, to bear its early testimony of counsel and warning,
instruction and entreaty, to the remnant church. It was submitted to the
divinely appointed tests of the word and to examination by its fruits, as we
shall see.
Accepted because it met every test specified by the
Scriptures of truth, the spirit of prophecy was received by this Sabbath-keeping
company as the third of the three great distinguishing marks disclosed in the
word as identifying the true church for the last days. Its blessed influence
upon the life and expansion of the Seventh-day Adventist Church is the theme of
the closing section of this book.

